[SOLVED]  Results and Discussion sections in Academic Writer

Once you have completed your Results and Discussion sections in Academic Writer, download your paper in Word format (from the EXPORT section of the navigation panel).  Then, upload your Word (*doc or *docx) file using the Start Assignment button on this page to submit your paper by its due date and time.
Not including your title page or references, your Results and Discussion should not exceed 1000 words, or approximately four pages (Times New Roman, 12pt, double-spaced, as formatted in Academic Writer). This is a maximum, not a target.  Clarity and succinctness are important in scientific writing.
🟢 Results & Discussion (checklist)
As you work on your papers this semester, use the following objectives as a checklist for the assigned sections of your paper.  These criteria will be used in the grading rubrics for your paper assignments.
Note that not all objectives will be relevant within a particular section of your paper.  If a specific objective does not apply to your research, you do not have to include it.  Before submitting a paper assignment, review its rubric to make sure that you have covered all applicable objectives in your writing.
TITLE
• Identify main variables and theoretical issues under investigation and the relationships between them.
• Identify the populations studied.
RESULTS
Participant Flow
• Report the flow of participants, including
‒ total number of participants in each group at each stage of the study
‒ flow of participants through each stage of the study
Recruitment
• Provide dates defining the periods of recruitment and repeated measures or follow-up.
Statistics and Data Analysis
• Provide information detailing the statistical and data-analytic methods used, including
‒ missing data
› frequency or percentages of missing data
› empirical evidence and/or theoretical arguments for the causes of data that are missing
› methods actually used for addressing missing data, if any
‒ descriptions of each primary and secondary outcome, including the total sample and each subgroup, that includes the number of cases, cell means, standard deviations, and other measures that characterize the data used
‒ inferential statistics, including
› results of all inferential tests conducted, including exact p values if null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) methods were used, and reporting the minimally sufficient set of statistics (e.g., dfs, mean square [MS] effect, MS error) needed to construct the tests
› effect-size estimates and confidence intervals on estimates that correspond to each inferential test conducted, when possible
• Report any problems with statistical assumptions and/or data distributions that could affect the validity of findings.
DISCUSSION
Support of Original Hypotheses
• Provide a statement of support or nonsupport for all hypotheses, whether primary or secondary, including
‒ distinction by primary and secondary hypotheses
‒ discussion of the implications of exploratory analyses in terms of both substantive findings and error rates that may be uncontrolled
Similarity of Results
• Discuss similarities and differences between reported results and work of others.
Interpretation
• Provide an interpretation of the results, taking into account
‒ sources of potential bias and threats to internal and statistical validity
‒ imprecision of measurement protocols
‒ overall number of tests or overlap among tests
‒ adequacy of sample sizes and sampling validity
Generalizability
• Discuss generalizability (external validity) of the findings, taking into account
‒ target population (sampling validity)
‒ other contextual issues (setting, measurement, time; ecological validity)
Implications
• Discuss implications for future research, program, or policy.