This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction: Attention-getting material |
5 to >4.0 pts
Speaker employs effective attention-getting strategies that are relevant and appropriate. |
4 to >1.0 pts
There is a purposeful attention-getter, but it is not effective in the context of the speech; may not be relevant or appropriate for the speech. |
1 to >0 pts
No attempt to provide the audience with an effective attention-getter to the speech. |
|
5 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction: Audience Purpose |
5 to >4.0 pts
Student provides social significance to the audience and identifies why students should want (or need) to hear the speech. |
4 to >2.0 pts
Student makes an attempt to establish a purpose to the speech, but there is no establishment of social significance for the audience. |
2 to >0 pts
No attempt to provide social significance to the audience. |
|
5 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction: Thesis and Preview of Main Points |
10 to >8.0 pts
Student clearly establishes the thesis of the speech and previews the main points. |
8 to >2.0 pts
Student provides a thesis statement OR a preview of the main points, but not both elements. Or the thesis statement/preview of main points is unclear. |
2 to >0 pts
No thesis statement or preview of main points in the introduction of the speech. |
|
10 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction: Establishing Credibility |
5 to >3.0 pts
Excellent. Student establishes speaker competence, trustworthiness, dynamism, and care for audience. |
3 to >0.0 pts
Average. Other elements present. No speaker competence. How are you qualified to present on this topic? |
0 pts
No Marks |
|
5 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization: Logical organization |
10 to >8.0 pts
Very good use of one of the accepted organization patterns. There are between two and five main points that are about equal in length and development. |
8 to >4.0 pts
Fair organization. Main points aren’t quite equal in terms of time and development. |
4 to >0 pts
Main points are organized in an unclear way. Transitions and/or connective sentences would help to demonstrate the organization of the speech. |
|
10 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization: Use of Transitions and Connectives |
10 to >8.0 pts
Student employs full sentence connective sentences between main points to demonstrate the overall organization of the body of the speech. Connective sentences summarize the previous main point and preview the next main point. |
8 to >2.0 pts
There is some effort to transition between the main points. Connective sentences would be more effective. |
2 to >0 pts
No noticeable transitioning between main points to guide audience members through the speech. |
|
10 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelopment: Social Significance |
5 to >4.0 pts
Student uses relevant sections in the introduction and conclusion and throughout the speech to make this speech timely and relevant to the audience. |
4 to >2.0 pts
Student makes the effort to establish audience relevance in EITHER the introduction or conclusion, or in the body, of the speech. |
2 to >0 pts
Very vague establishment of audience relevance in the speech. |
|
5 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelopment: Support |
15 to >14.0 pts
Very well done. The speech includes information from at least five outside sources to support the main points and thesis statement. |
14 to >6.0 pts
Fair. The speech includes information from two or fewer outside sources to support the main points and thesis statement. |
6 to >0 pts
Student provides unclear or minimal outside evidence to demonstrate what the main points are. |
|
15 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion: Restatement of Thesis and Review Main Points |
10 to >9.0 pts
The conclusion of the speech features a complete restatement of the thesis and a concise review of the main points. |
9 to >5.0 pts
The conclusion of the speech features EITHER a complete restatement of the thesis OR a review of the main points. |
5 to >2.0 pts
Thesis statement and review of main points are very unclear. |
2 to >0 pts
No thesis statement or review of main points at the end of the speech. |
|
10 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion: Review Audience Purpose |
5 to >4.0 pts
Student provides social significance to the audience and identifies what the audience got out of listening to the speech. |
4 to >0.0 pts
Student makes an attempt to review the purpose to the speech, but there is no establishment of social significance for the audience. |
0 pts
No attempt to provide social significance to the audience. |
|
5 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion: Provide closure (clincher) |
5 to >4.0 pts
Speaker employs effective closure strategies that are relevant and appropriate. |
4 to >0.0 pts
There is a purposeful closing, but it is not effective in the context of the speech; may not be relevant or appropriate for the speech. |
0 pts
The conclusion felt a bit rushed and unplanned. |
|
5 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDelivery: Effective extemporaneous delivery |
35 to >33.0 pts
Outstanding. Confident presentation. Effective use of note cards and presentation aid. Mostly very good eye contact with the entire audience. Appropriate tone, pace of speech, and vocal projection. Good posture. |
33 to >20.0 pts
Exceeds expectations. Good use of note cards and presentation aid. Good eye contact with the entire audience. Appropriate tone and posture. Vocal projection might be low, and the pace of speech might be either too quick or too slow. Some vocal fillers. |
20 to >10.0 pts
Acceptable. Good use of note cards. Some reading of notes while maintaining some eye contact with the audience. Fair tone and posture. Some consistent vocal fillers. Watch your pace of speech and volume. |
10 to >0 pts
Less effective style of delivery. Heavy reading and minimal eye contact with the audience. There may be consistent use of vocal fillers. Heavy reading can also lead to speaking too quickly. Keep volume up so the audience can hear. |
|
35 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDELIVERY: Did you fit your speech within the three to five minute speech time requirement? |
10 to >9.0 pts
Yes! my speech did not exceed the five-minute maximum time. |
9 to >0 pts
Unfortunately not! My speech exceeded the 5-minute maximum time. |
|
10 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDELIVERY: Were we able to see you from the waist up (50% of your body) throughout the speech? |
15 to >14.0 pts
Yes! I was not too close to my screen and was visible to my audience from the waist up for the majority of my speech. |
14 to >0 pts
My posture was less effective. I was too close to the screen throughout my speech (so my audience couldn’t see at least 50% of my body). My audience was unable to effectively assess my posture. I may also have been reading from my screen instead of using an outline or note cards. |
|
15 pts |
Total Points: 145 |